* These elements are linked to specific goals of the Sustainable Mining Plan
In regions with significant socio-economic deprivation, or as part of mine closure planning, needs to adopt a specific approach called Collaborative Regional Development or CRD. In line with the Anglo American Sustainable Mining Plan, is about acting as a catalyst for change in the communities and regions where we operate, in cross-sectoral, multi-organisational partnership with other stakeholders to promote larger scale, long-term development. looks beyond the immediate vicinity of our sites to identify opportunities to improve the prospects of those in our host regions, independent of our presence, so the benefits will be felt long beyond the life of the mine.
is not a separate, standalone programme but should rather be considered a new approach to . Over time, and the current local approach should form an integrated approach that puts initiative sustainability at the centre. should be delivered in partnership, focusing on both local and regional development over a short, medium- and long-term horizon. The Sustainable Mining Plan, which applies to all sites, is an important driver of our activities. The three Thriving Communities stretch goals in the plan – education, health and well-being, and livelihoods – will typically form the basis for the bulk of our work, although other locally-relevant initiatives will also often be necessary.
Together, and play an important role in Anglo American’s approach to securing socio-political acceptance and our social licence to operate. In this sense, and contribute to risk management. Strategic and effective projects are controls to manage risks to the business. Where there is a legal requirement related to , the relevant projects are controls to manage legal and compliance risks to the business. See Table 4A.1 for a more detailed overview of how fits with sites’ approach. Also refer to the guidance note (see 4A.4 Tools and Guidance Notes).
TABLE 4A.1 – and
An project can also be a control in the management of potential social and human rights impacts and other risks to the business. For example, a safety campaign to improve driving habits in local communities may improve levels of safe behaviours, contributing to a decrease in the likelihood of off-site, public-road incidents involving site transportation. Similarly, supporting development of other economic sectors outside the area of influence can be a control to prevent or limit site-induced migration (SIM) (see Section 4G). also offers opportunities to mitigate future risks related to closure and dependency on our mines by diversifying local economies through creating alternative livelihoods.
projects and initiatives are underpinned by a participative approach that promotes collaboration and partnership. This approach helps build trust, which is a prerequisite for securing socio-political acceptance and a social licence to operate.
Specifically, this section:
- provides an approach for defining priority areas
- provides guidance on selecting and designing strategic and effective projects, including how we monitor and evaluate
- outlines approach to partnership and collaboration
- lists the cross-departmental roles and responsibilities involved in managing
- outlines engagement requirements for .
Intended users
Planning for is typically the responsibility of the site’s Social Performance team. However, other departments, especially Human Resources and Supply Chain, play key roles in delivering activities such as local employment and local procurement. Therefore, the main intended users of this section are Social Performance, Human Resources, Supply Chain, other relevant department heads, and the members of the Social Performance Management Committee (SPMC).
Relevance to other sections
planning and implementation incorporates several of the guidance sections in the Social Way.
- Governance (Section 1):
- Social Performance Management Committee (SPMC) – planning and implementation typically involves multiple departments. The provides the platform to ensure that all relevant functions are engaged on a regular basis.
- Review and Planning (Section 2)
- As part of social performance review and planning, sites are required to review and update their internal and external context review. This information is required for planning activities. planning and objectives should be incorporated in the SMP.
- Engagement and Assessment (Section 3)
- Stakeholder Engagement (3A) – consultations and collaboration with local communities and government authorities are key to successful planning and implementation.
- Incident and Grievance Management (3B) – grievances or incidents may be related to the planning and/or implementation of projects.
- Social and Human Rights Impact and Risk Analysis (SHIRA) (3C) – an project can be a control in the management of social and human rights impacts and risks to the business and should therefore be captured in /the Baseline Workplace Risk Assessment and Control (WRAC).