CHECK
A monitoring and evaluation framework should be developed to track the scale of , its impacts, and the effectiveness of mitigation measures.
Task 10 – Monitor and evaluate
To monitor the scale of , its hotspots and impacts, sites should develop key indicators, drawing on observation, statistics, satellite imagery, and community consultations. Tracking these indicators and trends at an appropriate frequency allows sites to adjust controls as needed and allow for remodelling (see 4G.2 Task 6).
As part of , the implementation of -related Controls should be monitored and their effectiveness should be evaluated so that corrective action can be taken where needed. An example is provided in Table 4G.6.
Long-term objectives identified as part of Review and Planning (see Section 2) may also relate to , in which case a monitoring and evaluation framework should also be developed to track progress against the long-term objectives.
TABLE 4G.6 Example KPIs
| Potential Impact |
Controls |
Target |
Control owner |
Timeline |
Inputs |
Implementation check |
Outputs |
Outcomes |
Effectiveness |
| Describe the potential impact |
List the Controls |
What are we trying to achieve? |
List function responsible for the Control |
Date the Control should start and be competed |
Human and financial resources needed to implement the Control |
How do we know that the controls are being implemented? |
Outputs produced |
Changes that have occurred as a result of Control - Include sources of verification |
Value and success in managing the impact - Include sources of verification |
|
Example: Harassment of local women by site workers in the communities
|
Develop and enforce Code of Conduct addressing harassment in local communities |
0 incidents related to harassment of local women by site workers
0 grievances related to harassment of local women by site workers
|
Human Resources |
Start date, end date |
Staff time |
Code of Conduct developed/ updated |
Code of Conduct
Code of Conduct training logs show that workers are aware
|
Site workers spending more time in camp and less time in communities
Site workers are more respectful towards local women
Verification: camp sign-in data, community feedback
|
Decrease in incidents and grievances related to harassment of local women by site workers
Verification: number of grievances and incidents related to harassment of local women by site workers before and after control implementation
|
| Include Code of Conduct and harassment of local women as example in worker on-boarding |
Human Resources |
Start date, end date |
Staff time |
On-boarding presentation revised |
On-boarding presentation
On-boarding attendance logs show that workers are aware
|
| Close the worker camp, provide facilities and entertainment in camp |
Human Resources |
Start date, end date |
$ for improvement of facilities and entertainment in camp
Staff and contractor time
|
Camp rules updated to reflect changes
Improved facilities installed in camps
Regular evenings with entertainment scheduled in camps
|
Staff making use of new facilities and entertainment in camp |
Conduct participatory monitoring
Participatory monitoring is not a requirement in relation to . However, it is recommended where is having, or likely to have, significant impacts. The coordination group or the can conduct or be involved in participatory monitoring. This is especially valuable given the collaborative approach required to address many -related issues and challenges. More information about participatory monitoring is included in the Governance section (see Section 1).