.
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
The Social Way Toolkit
Find out more
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
Main Content

Emergency management planning involves a coordinated, cross-functional approach that involves external as well as internal stakeholders and resources. It is critical that every site function understands its role and responsibilities with regards to the development and implementation of the EMP and associated procedures. Depending on the emergency, the Business Unit and/or Group may also have a role to play.

As stipulated in the EMS, the EMP must include a clear definition of the roles, responsibilities and relationships of all (internal and external) stakeholders responsible for the development and/or implementation of (parts of) the EMP and associated procedures. Cross-functional input and collaboration is typically required from, but is not limited to, public emergency response service providers, SHE and Social Performance, general management, and from the Business Unit (BU) and Group in relation to crisis management (see Section 4D.3).

As per the EMS, every site is required to complete an internal capacity assessment as guided by the EMS Self-Assessment Document (AATS-703-006). The internal capacity assessment identifies the physical and financial resources required and currently in place to respond to emergency scenarios.

Throughout the emergency management cycle, a multi-disciplinary site team should work together to plan and implement emergency response and recovery activities.

Box 4D.7 Involving Legal, Finance/Insurance, and Business Continuity in Emergency Response and Recovery Planning

When developing the EMP and TARPs, the site’s cross-functional emergency management team should engage and align with Legal, Finance/Insurance, and Business Continuity and Crisis Management at site, BU, and Group as appropriate, in particular on the recovery component. This is to strengthen alignment and understanding of roles and responsibilities, and to pre-emptively avoid issues that may arise with insurance obligations, financing requirements, permitting and other legal requirements, which could delay emergency response and recovery efforts.

Sometimes, for example, immigration and customs obligations may slow down the import of emergency response and recovery equipment and people, certain insurance clauses could impede accepting responsibility for clean-up and compensation, the internal system for approving and allocating funds and resources may be inefficient and slow, there may be regulatory barriers that impede the use of certain methods for clean-up, and there may be certain permits required for response or recovery efforts.

4D.2 Guidance | Plan
4.Impact and risk prevention and management  |  4D Emergency Management Planning for Site-Induced Emergencies with Off-Site Impacts  |  4D.2 Guidance  |  Plan