.
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
The Social Way Toolkit
Find out more
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
Main Content

3A.1 Stakeholder engagement

Contents in this section:

Guiding principles

The purpose of stakeholder engagement is to build mutually beneficial, long-term relationships with those who are affected by, or who can affect, a site or Anglo American more broadly. The more effectively sites engage, the more able and likely they are to address issues important to stakeholders. This leads to higher levels of trust and acceptance.

Under the Social Way, stakeholder engagement is underpinned by a set of guiding principles. It should be:

  • Dialogue-based - Stakeholder engagement should create opportunities for a two-way discussion and for stakeholders to input into company decisions that affect their lives. This dynamic is the cornerstone of all aspects of social performance, from discovery through to closure.
  • Strategic - Engagement should be outcomes based. A site’s potential impacts, risks and long-term objectives should inform engagement priorities and be informed by stakeholder perspectives.
  • Proactive - Activities should be pre-planned as far as possible. Early and regular communication is critical, allowing space for stakeholders to express any concerns and for the site to adjust its approach accordingly. Communication should provide stakeholders with the necessary information to meaningfully inform their position on issues and policies that affect them and our sites.
  • Clear and direct - Information relevant to stakeholders should be communicated in ways that the audience will understand, based on their language, education, literacy level, interests and concerns. Engagement should be underpinned by openness and honesty about any potential adverse impacts and include explanations of who may be affected, when and how.
  • Inclusive - It is important to engage with all affected stakeholders, including vulnerable groups, by using tailored engagement approaches. Engagement approaches should be designed to avoid creating or exacerbating any intra or inter community conflicts or power imbalances in communities.
  • Ongoing - Engagement is a continuous, regular and iterative process. Reporting back to stakeholders is vital to explain how their feedback and views were considered.
  • Shared and understood internally - Social Performance teams must be able to translate what they hear ‘outside the fence’ in a manner that resonates with internal management so that engagement results in action.

Key functions of stakeholder engagement

Stakeholder engagement fulfils several important functions. Sites should consider the areas depicted in Figure 3A.1 when planning their engagement activities.

stakeholder-engagement

Figure 3A.1 Functions of stakeholder engagement

Multi-disciplinary approach

Successful stakeholder engagement is a site-wide responsibility. While the Social Performance team will have lead responsibility for most local external relationships, some will be held by other departments. Clarity about the primary ‘relationship-holder’ and co-ordination between teams requires ongoing collaboration. Table 3A.1 provides examples of what this might look like in practice.

Box 3A.2 Internal stakeholders with an external presence

  • Local employees
  • Labour unions
  • Local contractors and sub-contractors working on site.

The boundary between internal and external stakeholders is porous: workplace information travels with employees off site, and vice versa. These employees may be the first to see warning signs of social problems or community unrest. Equally, dissatisfaction with conditions of work can precipitate unrest in the wider community. Human resources take the lead in relation to the workforce, while other departments will be responsible for specific contractors or sub-contractors, emphasising the importance of close collaboration.

Sites are required to develop a cross-functional Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP). This will ensure sites maintain a comprehensive record of stakeholders and engagement activities.

The Social Performance Management Committee (SPMC) (see Section 1) serves as the primary mechanism for co-ordinating this cross-cutting and multi-departmental approach to stakeholder engagement.

Site teams should ensure that responsibilities for engaging with regional and national level stakeholders relevant to the site’s area of influence are clearly understood and aligned across different levels of the organisation (for example, with the communications and government relations teams at Country and Group level).

Table 3A.1 Examples of cross-functional collaboration on stakeholder engagement

Department Stakeholders Supporting department Supporting role in relation to stakeholders
Social Performance
  • Affected communities (individuals and households)
  • Traditional leaders
  • Community groups and civil-society organisations
  • Political leaders
  • Administrative authorities
  • Vulnerable groups
  • SED partners
  • Local NGOs
  • Artisanal and small-scale miners
  • Social infrastructure and service providers
  • Opportunistic migrants
  • Local education providers
  • Religious or faith-based institutions/organisations
  • Human Resources
  • Security
  • SHE
  • Communications
  • Operations/technical teams
  • Government Relations
  • Information on environmental, health and safety impact and risk management
  • Operational updates
  • Explaining technical policies, plans or procedures relevant to external stakeholders
  • Details of recruitment and procurement opportunities and requirements Permitting/ regulatory updates
Human Resources
  • Workforce
  • Labour unions
  • Contractor workforce
  • Government labour agencies
  • Social Performance
  • SHE
  • Information on job opportunities – both numbers and skill levels required
  • Ensuring clarity, balance and fairness in local recruitment
Security
  • Police
  • Military
  • Security contractors
  • Emergency service providers
  • Social Performance
  • Human Resources
  • SHE
  • Supply Chain
  • Government Relations
  • Communicating security arrangements and procedures
  • Ensuring respectful and appropriate behaviour towards local communities
Supply Chain
  • Local businesses and business associations
  • Site suppliers
  • Contractors and sub-contractors
  • Social Performance
  • All departments in determining the criteria for contractors and suppliers
  • Opportunities to provide goods and services
  • Capacity-building on procurement requirements and how to understand supplier criteria
Safety and Sustainable Development
  • Government authorities and regulatory bodies
  • Health agencies
  • Emergency service providers
  • Social Performance
  • All departments in following SHE protocols
  • Environmental impacts – identification, management and monitoring
  • Road traffic safety
  • Health and safety advice and warnings
  • Emergency preparedness and response protocols
Communications
  • Media (radio, TV, newspapers, social media)
  • Social Performance
  • All departments in providing technical information for communication
  • Communication of policies, procedures, safety protocols, etc.
  • Design of materials to communicate technical information
  • Planning and hosting events
Operations/ technical teams
  • Contractors and suppliers
  • Employees
  • Social Performance
  • SHE
  • Human Resources
  • Long-term business goals, specifically Life of Asset Plan
  • Project schedules and activities (e.g. construction, drilling, blasting)
Government Relations (Country level function)
  • Government ministries
  • Regulator
  • All
  • Government Relations
  • Communication of government laws and regulations

Lifecycle planning

Stakeholder engagement is a requirement at all stages of the asset lifecycle from discovery through to closure and post-closure. The scale, depth and nature of the engagement with stakeholders will fluctuate according to the precise stage, planned activities and the level of a site's impacts.

During discovery, the focus of engagement activities will be on doing a preliminary mapping of stakeholders, including identifying potentially vulnerable groups and Indigenous Peoples; explaining the mining process to stakeholders (who may have had little experience with the industry), including being transparent about potential impacts, risks and opportunities; and managing expectations.

During project development, it is likely there will be heightened stakeholder expectations about the future development of the site, requiring more in-depth engagement. Engagement during this phase will need to support other key processes and activities being undertaken, such as: regulatory and permitting processes1; environmental and social impact assessments; land-acquisition processes and management programmes for physical and economic displacement; influx management; and early development and implementation of SED projects/programmes. Project development construction is likely to require extensive engagement with stakeholders on impacts and benefits and to address incidents and grievances. This will continue during operations ‒ though, if properly managed, the level of potential impacts and risks should stabilise during operations.

Local Accountability Mechanisms (see 3A.2 Guidance, Task 5) should be established by Feasibility Stage of project development.

Box 3A.3 Closure planning: Social transition

Social transition needs to be considered in stakeholder engagement planning from the early stages of project development through to closure. Key aspects to keep in mind in relation to social transition and stakeholder engagement include:

  • Involvement and agreement of stakeholders in the definition of the mine closure vision and post-closure land use through the Local Accountability Mechanisms (see 3A.2 Guidance, Task 5) and/or other appropriate processes.
  • Identifying stakeholders relevant to social transition and understanding their requirements to inform strategic planning for closure and to establish closure criteria and success criteria.
  • Alignment of the SEP (see 3A.2 Guidance, Task 4) with the closure plan. The SEP will outline more detailed requirements for engagements related to social transition as the mine nears closure.

Appropriate engagement is fundamental to stakeholders accepting the closure plan and to building external ownership of the plan and social transition success criteria over time. Please see the Mine Closure Toolkit V3.0 for additional information.

3A Stakeholder engagement | 3A.1 Introduction
3.Engagement and analysis  |  3A Stakeholder engagement  |  3A.1 Introduction