Sites are required to develop a cross-functional Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP). This will ensure sites maintain a comprehensive record of stakeholders and engagement activities.
The Social Performance Management Committee (SPMC) (see Section 1) serves as the primary mechanism for co-ordinating this cross-cutting and multi-departmental approach to stakeholder engagement.
Site teams should ensure that responsibilities for engaging with regional and national level stakeholders relevant to the site’s area of influence are clearly understood and aligned across different levels of the organisation (for example, with the communications and government relations teams at Country and Group level).
Table 3A.1 Examples of cross-functional collaboration on stakeholder engagement
Department |
Stakeholders |
Supporting department |
Supporting role in relation to stakeholders |
Social Performance |
- Affected communities (individuals and households)
- Traditional leaders
- Community groups and civil-society organisations
- Political leaders
- Administrative authorities
- Vulnerable groups
- partners
- Local
- Artisanal and small-scale miners
- Social infrastructure and service providers
- Opportunistic migrants
- Local education providers
- Religious or faith-based institutions/organisations
|
- Human Resources
- Security
- Communications
- Operations/technical teams
- Government Relations
|
- Information on environmental, health and safety impact and risk management
- Operational updates
- Explaining technical policies, plans or procedures relevant to external stakeholders
- Details of recruitment and procurement opportunities and requirements Permitting/ regulatory updates
|
Human Resources |
- Workforce
- Labour unions
- Contractor workforce
- Government labour agencies
|
|
- Information on job opportunities – both numbers and skill levels required
- Ensuring clarity, balance and fairness in local recruitment
|
Security |
- Police
- Military
- Security contractors
- Emergency service providers
|
- Social Performance
- Human Resources
- Supply Chain
- Government Relations
|
- Communicating security arrangements and procedures
- Ensuring respectful and appropriate behaviour towards local communities
|
Supply Chain |
- Local businesses and business associations
- Site suppliers
- Contractors and sub-contractors
|
- Social Performance
- All departments in determining the criteria for contractors and suppliers
|
- Opportunities to provide goods and services
- Capacity-building on procurement requirements and how to understand supplier criteria
|
Safety and Sustainable Development |
- Government authorities and regulatory bodies
- Health agencies
- Emergency service providers
|
- Social Performance
- All departments in following protocols
|
- Environmental impacts – identification, management and monitoring
- Road traffic safety
- Health and safety advice and warnings
- Emergency preparedness and response protocols
|
Communications |
- Media (radio, TV, newspapers, social media)
|
- Social Performance
- All departments in providing technical information for communication
|
- Communication of policies, procedures, safety protocols, etc.
- Design of materials to communicate technical information
- Planning and hosting events
|
Operations/ technical teams |
- Contractors and suppliers
- Employees
|
- Social Performance
- Human Resources
|
- Long-term business goals, specifically Life of Asset Plan
- Project schedules and activities (e.g. construction, drilling, blasting)
|
Government Relations (Country level function) |
- Government ministries
- Regulator
|
|
- Communication of government laws and regulations
|
Lifecycle planning
Stakeholder engagement is a requirement at all stages of the asset lifecycle from discovery through to closure and post-closure. The scale, depth and nature of the engagement with stakeholders will fluctuate according to the precise stage, planned activities and the level of a site's impacts.
During discovery, the focus of engagement activities will be on doing a preliminary mapping of stakeholders, including identifying potentially vulnerable groups and Indigenous Peoples; explaining the mining process to stakeholders (who may have had little experience with the industry), including being transparent about potential impacts, risks and opportunities; and managing expectations.
During project development, it is likely there will be heightened stakeholder expectations about the future development of the site, requiring more in-depth engagement. Engagement during this phase will need to support other key processes and activities being undertaken, such as: regulatory and permitting processes1; environmental and social impact assessments; land-acquisition processes and management programmes for physical and economic displacement; influx management; and early development and implementation of projects/programmes. Project development construction is likely to require extensive engagement with stakeholders on impacts and benefits and to address incidents and grievances. This will continue during operations ‒ though, if properly managed, the level of potential impacts and risks should stabilise during operations.
Local Accountability Mechanisms (see 3A.2 Guidance, Task 5) should be established by Feasibility Stage of project development.