.
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
The Social Way Toolkit
Find out more
Add title here
Download
Mega Nav Image
Main Content

The Social Consequence Matrix provides guidance for identifying the significance rating for Vulnerability and intends to capture how vulnerable, or resilient, those impacted are in relation to the specific impact. For example, a community with high systemic vulnerability in relation to natural-resource dependence may not be vulnerable to a certain health impact.

Some individuals or groups might be more vulnerable, or less resilient, to a certain impact than others. For example:

  • children are more vulnerable to health impacts because of air pollution
  • poor households may be fully dependent on subsistence farming without access to alternative livelihoods, making them vulnerable to impacts on their land
  • areas with poor sanitation and hygiene may be more vulnerable to communicable diseases
  • women are more vulnerable to domestic abuse and gender-based violence
  • women may not have equal rights in terms of land ownership and may therefore be more vulnerable in physical resettlement processes
  • LGBTQ+ people may not have equal access to work because of societal discrimination.

In determining vulnerability to each potential impact, sites should use and build on the systemic vulnerability identified in Section 2. Examples are provided in table 3C.2. The ‘Description’ column in the Vulnerability section of the Social Consequence Matrix provides an overview of factors that may determine vulnerability for every Category.

Adverse impacts on vulnerable groups require different and/or additional controls. In terms of both prevention and mitigation of adverse impacts, sites may also need to initiate additional, targeted and long-term measures to address both the causes and consequences of vulnerability.

In the event that some people are vulnerable to the impact and others are not, sites should provide two different consequence levels and two different sets of mitigation measures (i.e. for those vulnerable to the impact, and for those not vulnerable to it).

Table 3C.2 Determining vulnerability to potential impacts

Vulnerability Capital Potential impact related to Vulnerability Capital Potential vulnerable sub-groups Potential controls for vulnerable sub-groups
Economic Land degradation as a result of environmental impacts Some relatively poor households have high dependency on subsistence farming without access to alternative livelihoods Restoration of land, lease of alternative land, support to establish alternative livelihoods
Political Transition to construction leads to more police in the area Minorities or political activists may be vulnerable to an increased public-security presence Additional monitoring, regular engagement with groups/individuals, dialogue with NGOs, dialogue with security forces
Social Increase in ‘social ills’ Women and girls vulnerable to harassment and assault Support for street lighting, provide night-time transport to/from site
Physical Community cut off from health services Elderly people without the capacity to travel long distances to alternative health services Put in place alternative access, or transport provision, or support to mobile clinics
Natural Increase in dust and traffic fumes Children more susceptible to health impacts Close monitoring of impacts. Provision of air filtering in schools
3C.2 Guidance | Do
3.Engagement and analysis  |  3C Social and human rights impact and risk analysis (SHIRA)  |  3C.2 Guidance  |  Do